We read the manuscript and tell you what is standing between it and acceptance — language, structure, statistics, or scope.
You get a written assessment, not a quote. If the problem is the science rather than the sentences, we say so before you spend anything.
A subject-matter editor works through the manuscript in tracked changes, with a comment against every judgement call.
You see every change and can reject any of them. Nothing is rewritten silently.
A biostatistician checks that the tests match the design and that the reported figures support the claims.
Optional, and worth it when reviewers have previously raised methods questions.
We shortlist journals by scope fit, indexing, turnaround and realistic acceptance odds — and explain the reasoning for each.
The shortlist names journals we think will reject you too, and why that is worth knowing.
Formatting to the target journal, cover letter, and the submission itself if you would rather not handle the portal.
Each journal has its own house style. We apply it rather than handing you a checklist.
We help you answer the review letter point by point, including the points you intend to push back on.
A well-argued rebuttal turns more revisions into acceptances than a compliant one.
If your manuscript has already been edited and you only want the journal shortlist, buy that. If you are holding a review letter and need help answering it, start at the last step. There is no package you have to break up to get the part you need.
The assessment comes back within one working day. A standard manuscript is edited in three to five, and shorter turnarounds are available. We confirm the date when we quote, and we hold to it.