60+
Countries our
authors write from
Why researchers come to us
A reviewer should be arguing with your findings, not your grammar
Manuscripts that come back on language grounds are rarely badly researched. They are hard to read, and a tired reviewer stops arguing with the science and starts arguing with the sentences. That is the gap we close.
Free assessment
Send an abstract and we tell you what stands between it and acceptance. No charge, no obligation.
Editors with doctorates
Your manuscript goes to someone with a research degree in its field, not to a general science desk.
Your work stays yours
We claim no rights, we do not train models on your manuscript, and we delete files on request.
A real edit
One sentence, three changes
The result of experiment was showed that the treated sample have a significant difference comparing with control group, which is indicate that the compound make an effect on the cell growth.
The experiment showed that treated samples differed significantly from the control group, indicating that the compound affects cell growth.
Three changes: a tense agreement, a comparison the reviewer would have queried, and a nominalisation unpacked into a verb. Field: Molecular biology.
Services
What we do
Grammar, clarity, structure and register brought to the standard international journals expect, in tracked changes you can review line by line.
A reasoned shortlist of indexed journals matched to your scope, methods and timeline, with the odds stated plainly.
PhD-qualified biostatisticians check design, tests and reporting before a reviewer does it for you.
Translation by subject specialists who hold research degrees in your field, not general translators working from a glossary.
A full similarity report, plus guidance on which flagged passages actually matter and how to resolve them.
End-to-end handling from submission through peer review, revision and acceptance, with one contact throughout.
22+
years in business
10K+
researchers helped
500+
indexed journals
98%
client satisfaction
The publication path
From draft to acceptance
Assessment
We read the manuscript and tell you what is standing between it and acceptance — language, structure, statistics, or scope.
Language editing
A subject-matter editor works through the manuscript in tracked changes, with a comment against every judgement call.
Statistical review
A biostatistician checks that the tests match the design and that the reported figures support the claims.
Journal selection
We shortlist journals by scope fit, indexing, turnaround and realistic acceptance odds — and explain the reasoning for each.
Submission
Formatting to the target journal, cover letter, and the submission itself if you would rather not handle the portal.
Response to reviewers
We help you answer the review letter point by point, including the points you intend to push back on.
Get in touch
Send us your abstract
An editor in your field reads it and replies with an assessment of what stands between your manuscript and acceptance, a fixed price and a date. There is no charge for the assessment and no obligation afterwards.
The assessment is specific. It names the sections that will draw a reviewer's objection, tells you whether the statistics support the claims you have made of them, and says plainly if the work is a poor fit for the journal you had in mind — including when the answer is that it needs no help from us.
Send the abstract alone if that is all you have ready. If the draft is not yet in English, send it in 日本語, 中文, 한국어, Bahasa, Português, العربية and we will read it in the language it was written in.
Or email us directly
[email protected]
Every enquiry answered
Within one working day
Tell us about your manuscript
In an author's words
Two papers, both accepted
I had been rejected twice on language grounds and could not see what the reviewers were seeing. The tracked changes showed me. Both papers were accepted, and I write differently now.