A statistical review is an expert check of a manuscript’s study design, sample size, choice of statistical tests, assumptions, results and reporting, to confirm that the conclusions are supported by the analysis. Statistical analysis services go further and carry out the analysis on your data. Frontier Publishers’ PhD statisticians work in SPSS, R, Stata, SAS and NVivo and report to guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE and PRISMA.
Methodological and statistical weaknesses are among the most frequent reasons for rejection after peer review. A statistician checks whether the research design is accurate and complete, whether the sample size is sufficient, and whether the conclusions follow from the results.
For authors who have collected data but not yet analysed it, our statisticians run the analysis, produce publication-ready tables and figures, and write up the statistical methods and results sections to the reporting standard your journal expects.
Authors of trials, cohort and case-control studies who must meet strict reporting guidelines.
Researchers whose reviewers have questioned the statistics, sample size or design.
Teams and students who have data but no in-house statistical expertise.
Biostatisticians, data analysts and methodologists with publishing experience in your field.
Problems in design and analysis are found and fixed before peer review.
Analysis in SPSS, R, Stata, SAS and NVivo, with reproducible output.
A methods note you can quote, and help answering statistical comments.
Send your manuscript and target journal. An expert reviews it and replies with a recommended approach and a fixed quote, with no obligation.
A full iThenticate similarity report, plus expert guidance on which flagged passages actually matter and how to resolve them.
A journal-style review report from an expert in your field, identifying weaknesses in methods, results and argument before real reviewers do.
A reasoned shortlist of indexed journals matched to your scope, methods and timeline, with the odds stated plainly.