A graphical abstract is a single, concise visual summary of a paper’s main findings, now requested or encouraged by many journals and widely shared on social media. Figure formatting makes a manuscript’s charts and images meet the journal’s artwork rules for resolution, dimensions, file type, fonts and labelling. Frontier Publishers’ science designers create graphical abstracts and editable vector illustrations and format figures so they pass technical checks at submission.
Publishers and journals increasingly emphasise accurate, high-quality graphics in research. A good graphical abstract is simple, visually appealing and conveys the main message of your study without excessive text or complex graphics.
Our designers create graphical abstracts from your manuscript, draw vector artwork from a hand-drawn sketch or reference image, and reformat existing figures to your journal’s specifications. AI-generated images are avoided, because many journals restrict their use.
Researchers targeting journals that require or encourage a graphical abstract.
Authors who lack the software, expertise or time to produce professional graphics.
Researchers who need a clear poster or presentation visuals for a meeting.
Designers with backgrounds in medicine, biology, molecular sciences and engineering.
Every figure meets the artwork requirements that commonly trigger technical rejection.
If format adjustments are required again for the same journal within 60 days, we reformat free of charge.
Graphical abstracts help readers grasp your findings quickly and are shared widely online.
Send your manuscript and target journal. An expert reviews it and replies with a recommended approach and a fixed quote, with no obligation.
PhD-qualified biostatisticians check study design, tests and reporting, or run the analysis, before a reviewer raises it for you.
A full iThenticate similarity report, plus expert guidance on which flagged passages actually matter and how to resolve them.
A journal-style review report from an expert in your field, identifying weaknesses in methods, results and argument before real reviewers do.