A plagiarism check for a research paper compares the manuscript against published articles, web pages and other submissions to produce a similarity index and a report of matching text. Journals use the same software, iThenticate, when screening submissions. Frontier Publishers runs the check before you submit and adds expert feedback on which matches are acceptable, such as methods phrasing and properly cited quotations, and which need to be revised.
Most journals screen every submission with similarity software, and a high score can lead to immediate rejection even when the overlap is unintentional. Checking first lets you fix problems on your own terms.
After your order is confirmed, your file is scanned with iThenticate and our publication experts add detailed feedback. You get the complete report and an explanation of which matches are likely to concern an editor.
Researchers who want to know their similarity score before the journal does.
Researchers reusing their own theses, preprints or conference papers.
Teams checking student and co-author contributions before submission.
The same iThenticate check that editors run on submissions.
Experts explain which matches are acceptable and which could lead to rejection.
Most reports are returned within 1–2 business days.
Your manuscript is checked without being added to a repository that would flag it later.
Send your manuscript and target journal. An expert reviews it and replies with a recommended approach and a fixed quote, with no obligation.
A journal-style review report from an expert in your field, identifying weaknesses in methods, results and argument before real reviewers do.
A reasoned shortlist of indexed journals matched to your scope, methods and timeline, with the odds stated plainly.
End-to-end handling from submission through peer review, revision and acceptance, with one contact throughout.